Legal Opinion

Smith v. Barber

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided June 6, 1899No. 18,306PublishedCited by 44 opinions

From the Boone Circuit Court.

1Opinion of the CourtHadley, J.

By a written contract, appellee agreed to furnish and set up in good working order, for appellants, a plant for the manufacture of ice, of the capacity of three tons daily, the power required to operate it not to exceed five horse. Appellants agreed to furnish the buildings, necessary foundations, woodbrine and outside tanks, power and water, shaftings, hangers and pulleys necessary to transmit power to the compressor, and, during the test trial of the machinery, the power, oil, light, water, other incidentals, and necessary assistance. After it was started, appellee was to furnish an…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. United States v. PeckSupreme Court of the United States · 1880
  2. Pittsburgh, Cincinnati, Chicago & St. Louis Railway Co. v. MooreIndiana Supreme Court · 1899
  3. Parke & Lacy Co. v. White River Lumber Co.California Supreme Court · 1894
  4. Wolf v. MarshCalifornia Supreme Court · 1880
  5. Zimmerman v. GaumerIndiana Supreme Court · 1899

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by44 opinions

  1. Blackford v. NeavesArizona Supreme Court · 1922
  2. Richards v. WilsonIndiana Supreme Court · 1916
  3. Winton Motor Carriage Co. v. Broadway Automobile Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1911
  4. Maynard v. WaidlichIndiana Supreme Court · 1901
  5. Quality Clothes Shop v. KeeneyIndiana Court of Appeals · 1914

39 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API