Legal Opinion

Halpern v. Austin

District Court, N.D. Georgia

Decided November 20, 1974No. Civ. A. C74-315APublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

O’KELLEY, District Judge:

The plaintiff has invoked federal jurisdiction under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 and its jurisdictional counterpart, 28 U.S.C. § 1343(3) and (4), requesting injunctive relief restraining the defendants from acting under Ga.Code § 30-204 and §§ 46-101, 46-102, 1 and for a declaratory judgment under 28 U.S.C. §§ 2201, 2202, declaring the provisions of the Georgia Code unconstitutional. As the constitutionality of state statutes is involved, and the question raised is substantial, a three-judge court has been convened pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2281.

The undisputed facts show that on…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Mullane v. Central Hanover Bank & Trust Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1950
  2. Armstrong v. ManzoSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
  3. Sniadach v. Family Finance Corp. of Bay ViewSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
  4. Mitchell v. W. T. Grant Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1974
  5. Baldwin v. HaleSupreme Court of the United States · 1864

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Betts v. TomDistrict Court, D. Hawaii · 1977
  2. Jahn v. ReganDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 1984
  3. Duranceau v. WallaceCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1984
  4. First National Bank v. HastyDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 1976
  5. Huggins v. DeinhardCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1982

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API