Halpern v. Austin
District Court, N.D. Georgia
1Opinion of the Court
O’KELLEY, District Judge:
The plaintiff has invoked federal jurisdiction under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 and its jurisdictional counterpart, 28 U.S.C. § 1343(3) and (4), requesting injunctive relief restraining the defendants from acting under Ga.Code § 30-204 and §§ 46-101, 46-102, 1 and for a declaratory judgment under 28 U.S.C. §§ 2201, 2202, declaring the provisions of the Georgia Code unconstitutional. As the constitutionality of state statutes is involved, and the question raised is substantial, a three-judge court has been convened pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2281.
The undisputed facts show that on…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Mullane v. Central Hanover Bank & Trust Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1950
- Armstrong v. ManzoSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
- Sniadach v. Family Finance Corp. of Bay ViewSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
- Mitchell v. W. T. Grant Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Baldwin v. HaleSupreme Court of the United States · 1864
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- Betts v. TomDistrict Court, D. Hawaii · 1977
- Jahn v. ReganDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 1984
- Duranceau v. WallaceCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1984
- First National Bank v. HastyDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 1976
- Huggins v. DeinhardCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1982
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.