Duranceau v. Wallace
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
FARRIS, Circuit Judge:
I. INTRODUCTION
Washington law provides expeditious procedures for the state’s Department of Social and Health Services to collect past due child support. R.C.W. § 74.20A. Ronald Duranceau brought suit in federal district court, alleging that the procedures violated the due process clause of the fourteenth amendment by failing to afford him adequate notice and an administrative hearing. On motion for summary judgment, the district court found the statute constitutional. We affirm.
II. STANDARD OF REVIEW
We review the district court’s decision de novo because the case was…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Mathews v. EldridgeSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Fuentes v. ShevinSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Sniadach v. Family Finance Corp. of Bay ViewSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
- Mitchell v. W. T. Grant Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1974
- North Georgia Finishing, Inc. v. Di-Chem, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1975
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- Paternity of CherylMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2001
- Gray v. Commissioner of RevenueMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1996
- Reigh v. SchleighCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1986
- Laubinger v. Department of RevenueMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1996
- Duranceau v. WallaceCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1984
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.