Legal Opinion
Huggins v. Deinhard
Court of Appeals of Arizona
Decided October 19, 1982No. 1 CA-CIV 5286PublishedCited by 12 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
BROOKS, Judge.
This is an appeal from a judgment in which the trial court utilized the Arizona garnishment procedures to provide a remedy for a mother (appellee) residing in California, who was attempting to collect unpaid child support from her ex-husband (appellant) under a California divorce decree. A writ of garnishment was issued against appellant’s bank account in Arizona.
The following issues have been presented for review:
1. Is an order for the payment of child support rendered by a California court entitled to full faith and credit in the Arizona courts as to child support…
2Cases cited26 opinions
- Fuentes v. ShevinSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Shaffer v. HeitnerSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
- Sniadach v. Family Finance Corp. of Bay ViewSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
- North Georgia Finishing, Inc. v. Di-Chem, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1975
- Sistare v. SistareSupreme Court of the United States · 1910
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Cynthia McCahey v. L.P. Investors, Allen M. Rosenthal, Affiliated Credit Adjusters, Sheriff of Suffolk County, Suffolk County ClerkCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1985
- Lenchyshyn v. Pelko Electric, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2001
- John L. Augustine v. A. Melvin McDonaldCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1985
- Cagle v. CarlsonCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1985
- Begay v. RobertsCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1990
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.