In Re Morton
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the CourtConrey, P. J.
By judgment of the superior court of Los Angeles County, entered in the year 1918, the petitioner was deprived of his license to practice law in the state of California. The facts as found by the court in that proceeding are set forth in a decision of the supreme court. (In re Morton, 179 Cal. 510 [177 Pac. 453].)
Petitioner alleges that during the succeeding seven years he has lived a “clean, sober and honorable life,” and has gained the confidence of all of the members of the bench and bar in the Texas counties where he has been practicing for some years under a license obtained prior to his…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- In Re MortonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1918
- In Re O'ConnellCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1923
3Cited by6 opinions
- Ex Parte MarshallMississippi Supreme Court · 1933
- In re SmithSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1945
- Application of Smith for Reinstatement as AttorneySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1945
- In Re CateCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1926
- State ex rel. Sorensen v. GoldmanNebraska Supreme Court · 1967
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.