Legal Opinion

Ex Parte Marshall

Mississippi Supreme Court

Decided April 17, 1933No. 30529PublishedCited by 45 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtEthridge, J.

Carl Marshall, who was disbarred as an attorney in the courts of this state, filed a petition in the chancery court of Hancock county, Mississippi, praying for reinstatement, and averring that he has been continuously a resident of the city of Bay St. Louis, in Hancock county, Mississippi, for more than thirty years; that on the 30th day of November, 1931, he was a practicing attorney in the courts of Mississippi, but on said date was disbarred by order of the Supreme Court of Mississippi. In re Marshall, 162 Miss. 364, 138 So. 298. He alleged that, since the date of his disbarment, he has…

2Cases cited24 opinions

  1. In re DaviesSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1880
  2. In the Matter of EbbsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1908
  3. People ex rel. Moses v. GoodrichIllinois Supreme Court · 1875
  4. In re the Charges Against DarrowIndiana Supreme Court · 1910
  5. In re HarrisSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1915

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by45 opinions

  1. Konigsberg v. State Bar of Cal.Supreme Court of the United States · 1957
  2. In the Matter of HissMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1975
  3. In Re: BrownWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1980
  4. In Re StumpCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1938
  5. Burgin v. Mississippi State BarMississippi Supreme Court · 1984

40 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API