In Re Morton
California Supreme Court
The facts are stated in the opinion of the court. Nathan Newby, Mattison B. Jones, and Claude B. Morton, for Appellant W. O. Morton. H. M. Barstow, Will H. Anderson, Tom C. Thornton, and Harry A. Hollzer, of Counsel. Leonard B. Slosson and Richard J. O. Culver, for Los Angeles Bar Association.
1Opinion of the Court
VICTOR E. SHAW, J., pro tem.
Upon an accusation filed by the Los Angeles Bar Association, charging W. Ona Morton, an attorney at law, with a violation of his professional duties, a hearing was had by the superior court of Los Angeles County, which caused a judgment to be entered depriving the accused of the right to practice as an attorney and counselor in the courts of the state of California. From this judgment the accused has appealed.
No attack is made upon the sufficiency of the accusation, which clearly charged the accused with the commission of acts which, if true, fully warranted the…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Matter of DanfordCalifornia Supreme Court · 1910
- People v. KrakerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1887
- In re HoughtonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1885
- In Re Alameda County Bar Ass'nCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1917
3Cited by16 opinions
- People v. ClappCalifornia Supreme Court · 1944
- People v. BurnessCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1942
- People v. RavenCalifornia Supreme Court · 1955
- People v. CoakleyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1951
- People v. HartridgeCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1955
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.