Legal Opinion

George v. Adamson

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided January 31, 1939No. 28276PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BAYLESS, O. J.

D. O. Adamson filed bis application for a writ of mandamus to be issued from the district court of Oklahoma county directed to J. T. George et al., members of the Basic Science Board of Oklahoma. The alternative writ issued and was served. Return thereon was made, and upon hearing a peremptory writ as to a certain matter was granted, and the application was denied as to the other matters. The board has appealed.

The so-called Basic Science Act, article 28, ch. 24, S. L. 1937, 59 Okla. St. Ann. sec. 701 et seq., became effective April 19, 1937. Section 19 thereof reads in part:

“It…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Bruner v. EatonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1926
  2. Roberts v. SimsSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1924
  3. Stanley v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1923

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. School District No. 6 of Pima County v. BarberArizona Supreme Court · 1958
  2. School District Re-11J, Alamosa County v. NorwoodSupreme Court of Colorado · 1982
  3. Edens v. Barberton Area Family Practice CenterOhio Supreme Court · 1989
  4. General Factors, Inc. v. BeckCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1965
  5. Simon v. BranhamSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1952

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API