Legal Opinion

Roberts v. Sims

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided October 21, 1924No. 14846PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

RAY, C.

The errors assigned are not preserved in the record by motion for new trial. The motion for new trial was filed the fourth day after 'the verdict was rendered. Section 574. Comp. Stat. 1921, provides:

“The application for a new trial must be made at the term the verdict, report or decision is rendered, and except for the cause of newly-discovered evidence, material for the party applying, which he could not, with reasonable diligence, have discovered and produced at the trial, or impossibility of making a ease-made, shall be within three days after the verdict or decision was…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Aultman & Taylor MacHinery Co. v. FussSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1922
  2. Roberts v. SealsSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1914
  3. Farmers' Grain & Supply Co. v. IsaacSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1916
  4. Western Coal & Mining Co. v. TullossSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1914
  5. Trent v. RichardsSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1923

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Niles v. ShinkleSupreme Court of Colorado · 1949
  2. Shaffer Oil & Ref. Co. v. ThomasSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1926
  3. Bruner v. EatonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1926
  4. City of Maud v. Tulsa Rig, Reel & Mfg. Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1933
  5. George v. AdamsonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1939

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API