Culver v. Miller
California Court of Appeal
The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtCraig, J.
This is an - action for damages for the breach of a written contract by which plaintiff alleged that he leased 170 acres of land from the defendants; that by the lease it was agreed that plaintiff should receive from defendants 312 shares of capital stock of the Imperial Water Company No. 1; that they furnished only a part of said stock and that the plaintiff was thereby damaged in the sum of $2,000. Defendants interposed a general demurrer iwhich was overruled. They thereupon filed an answer and counterclaim for $3,000 damages. After trial, the court rendered judgment in favor of the…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Swift v. Occidental Mining & Petroleum Co.California Supreme Court · 1903
- Perry v. QuackenbushCalifornia Supreme Court · 1894
- Harlan v. ElyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1880
- Merrill v. Southside Irrigation Co.California Supreme Court · 1896
- Canfield v. TobiasCalifornia Supreme Court · 1863
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Garber v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1964
- Nicolds v. StorchCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1944
- Comer v. Los Angeles Railway Corp.California Court of Appeal · 1928