Legal Opinion

Culver v. Miller

California Court of Appeal

Decided October 14, 1921No. 3549PublishedCited by 3 opinions

The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the CourtCraig, J.

This is an - action for damages for the breach of a written contract by which plaintiff alleged that he leased 170 acres of land from the defendants; that by the lease it was agreed that plaintiff should receive from defendants 312 shares of capital stock of the Imperial Water Company No. 1; that they furnished only a part of said stock and that the plaintiff was thereby damaged in the sum of $2,000. Defendants interposed a general demurrer iwhich was overruled. They thereupon filed an answer and counterclaim for $3,000 damages. After trial, the court rendered judgment in favor of the…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Swift v. Occidental Mining & Petroleum Co.California Supreme Court · 1903
  2. Perry v. QuackenbushCalifornia Supreme Court · 1894
  3. Harlan v. ElyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1880
  4. Merrill v. Southside Irrigation Co.California Supreme Court · 1896
  5. Canfield v. TobiasCalifornia Supreme Court · 1863

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Garber v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1964
  2. Nicolds v. StorchCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1944
  3. Comer v. Los Angeles Railway Corp.California Court of Appeal · 1928

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API