Comer v. Los Angeles Railway Corp.
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the CourtKnight, J.
Respondent, while driving an automobile on one of the streets in Los Angeles, collided with a broken trolley wire of the appellant company, sustaining injuries to himself and damage to his automobile. Thereupon he brought this action for damages and upon trial before a jury was awarded a verdict, but the judgment entered thereon was reversed on appeal because of erroneous instructions. (Comer v. Los Angeles Ry. Corp., 66 Cal. App. 219 [225 Pac. 869].) The action was then tried before the court sitting without a jury, and judgment was again rendered in respondent’s favor and the company again…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Lomita Land and Water Co. v. RobinsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1908
- Hulen v. StuartCalifornia Supreme Court · 1923
- Krasky v. WollpertCalifornia Supreme Court · 1901
- Neher v. KauffmanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1925
- Goodwin v. SnyderCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1924
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Fitzpatrick v. UnderwoodCalifornia Supreme Court · 1941
- Klein v. BakerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1931