Legal Opinion

Comer v. Los Angeles Railway Corp.

California Court of Appeal

Decided December 18, 1928No. Docket No. 6294PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtKnight, J.

Respondent, while driving an automobile on one of the streets in Los Angeles, collided with a broken trolley wire of the appellant company, sustaining injuries to himself and damage to his automobile. Thereupon he brought this action for damages and upon trial before a jury was awarded a verdict, but the judgment entered thereon was reversed on appeal because of erroneous instructions. (Comer v. Los Angeles Ry. Corp., 66 Cal. App. 219 [225 Pac. 869].) The action was then tried before the court sitting without a jury, and judgment was again rendered in respondent’s favor and the company again…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Lomita Land and Water Co. v. RobinsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1908
  2. Hulen v. StuartCalifornia Supreme Court · 1923
  3. Krasky v. WollpertCalifornia Supreme Court · 1901
  4. Neher v. KauffmanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1925
  5. Goodwin v. SnyderCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1924

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Fitzpatrick v. UnderwoodCalifornia Supreme Court · 1941
  2. Klein v. BakerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1931

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API