Legal Opinion

Garber v. City of Los Angeles

California Court of Appeal

Decided April 16, 1964No. Civ. 27653PublishedCited by 23 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBurke, P. J.

Plaintiff sued the City of Los Angeles for damages for personal injuries resulting from a fall caused by the defective condition of a public sidewalk. After plaintiff rested her case, defendant city moved for judgment pursuant to section 631.8 of the Code of Civil Procedure without producing evidence. The motion was granted, findings that the city had no actual or constructive notice of the dangerous condition and that plaintiff was contributorily negligent were made, and judgment was entered for the city. A motion for new trial was denied. Plaintiff appeals from the judgment and order…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. Greyhound Corp. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1961
  2. Peters v. City & County of San FranciscoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1953
  3. Whiting v. City of National CityCalifornia Supreme Court · 1937
  4. Nicholson v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1936
  5. Rafferty v. City of MarysvilleCalifornia Supreme Court · 1929

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by23 opinions

  1. Pottebaum v. HindsSupreme Court of Iowa · 1984
  2. Twomey v. Mitchum, Jones & Templeton, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1968
  3. Whitney Investment Co. v. Westview Development Co.California Court of Appeal · 1969
  4. South Bay Irrigation District v. California-American Water Co.California Court of Appeal · 1976
  5. Ball v. American Trial Lawyers Assn.California Court of Appeal · 1971

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API