Legal Opinion

Post v. Palpar, Inc.

California Court of Appeal

Decided September 19, 1960No. Civ. 18913PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtKaufman, P. J.

This is an appeal from a judgment of rescission in favor of Miles M. and Mary E. Post, the purchasers under a written contract for the sale of real property owned by the appellants. The appellants argue that the judgment must be reversed because of errors in the findings of fact and conclusions of law and in the admission of certain evidence. There is no merit in either of these arguments.

The facts are not in dispute. On May 7, 1956, respondents made a payment of $100 and signed a written deposit receipt agreement with the appellants for the purchase of an unimproved parcel of real property…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Rice v. California Lutheran HospitalCalifornia Supreme Court · 1945
  2. Buckner v. A. Leon & Co.California Supreme Court · 1928
  3. Main Street & Agricultural Park Railroad v. Los Angeles Traction Co.California Supreme Court · 1900
  4. Sass v. HankCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1951
  5. De Laguna Spaulding v. JonesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1953

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Hastings v. MatlockCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1985
  2. Harvard v. AndersonWyoming Supreme Court · 1974
  3. Schertzinger v. WilliamsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1961
  4. Harvard v. AndersonWyoming Supreme Court · 1974
  5. Rubino v. PrayCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1960

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API