Main Street & Agricultural Park Railroad v. Los Angeles Traction Co.
California Supreme Court
The facts are stated in the opinion.
1Opinion of the Court
SMITH, C.
The action was brought to recover money alleged to be due by written contract. The judgment was for the plaintiff. The points relied on for reversal are insufficiency of the complaint and of the findings, and error in sustaining demurrers to two affirmative defenses set up in the answer. In the view we take of the case it will be unnecessary to consider any but the last of these grounds.
At the dates hereinafter mentioned the plaintiff was the owner of a street railroad in the city of Los Angeles along Main street; and the defendant was the owner of a franchise for a railroad along…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Vanderbilt v. . SchreyerNew York Court of Appeals · 1883
- Smith v. WareNew York Supreme Court · 1816
- Reynolds v. NugentIndiana Supreme Court · 1865
- Heaver v. LanahanCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1891
- McCarty v. Hampton Building Ass'nSupreme Court of Iowa · 1883
3Cited by35 opinions
- n.sidney Nyhus v. Travel Management CorporationCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1972
- Homestead Supplies, Inc. v. Executive Life InsuranceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1978
- Schwartzreich v. . Bauman-Basch, Inc.New York Court of Appeals · 1921
- Guerrieri v. SeveriniCalifornia Supreme Court · 1958
- Grand Lodge of Scandinavian Fraternity of America, District No. 7 v. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1940
30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.