Legal Opinion

Harvard v. Anderson

Wyoming Supreme Court

Decided July 30, 1974No. 4313PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtChief Justice Parker

Plaintiffs, Alan D. Anderson and Arnold G. Vezina, brought an action for specific performance against defendant Frank E. Harvard on three instruments, two options to purchase real property 1 and an “Agreement” relating to the property, the complaint asserting that all right, title, and interest in the mentioned instruments had been assigned to them by the optionees, whose tender to defendant had been refused, and that plaintiffs offered to pay the optionor the purchase price for the property. The defendant denied the petition generally and asserted there had been no consideration for the…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. State ex rel. Goodgion v. LatimerSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1887
  2. Frank v. Stratford-HandcockWyoming Supreme Court · 1904
  3. Anthony Tile & Marble Co. v. H. L. Coble Construction Co.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1972
  4. Best Building Company v. SikesCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1965
  5. Panhandle Refining Co. v. BennettCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1929

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Roussalis v. Wyoming Medical Center, Inc.Wyoming Supreme Court · 2000
  2. Brodie v. General Chemical Corp.Wyoming Supreme Court · 1997
  3. Harvard v. AndersonWyoming Supreme Court · 1974

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API