Legal Opinion

California State Automobile Ass'n Inter-Insurance Bureau v. Warwick

California Supreme Court

Decided June 21, 1976No. S.F. 23429PublishedCited by 37 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

MOSK, J.

In this action for declaratory relief, the trial court ordered judgment for the plaintiff insurance carrier on the ground that the insurance contract did not provide coverage for defendant Hariy C. Warwick (hereinafter Warwick) in regard to the personal injury liability claims of his wife, defendant Bernice C. Warwick. The court declared that the insurer did not have a duty to defend or indemnify Warwick. Defendants appeal from the judgment. We affirm.

The facts are not in dispute. The insurer issued an automobile insurance policy to Warwick covering a 1969 Volvo station wagon…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Continental Casualty Co. v. Phoenix Construction Co.California Supreme Court · 1956
  2. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance v. JacoberCalifornia Supreme Court · 1973
  3. Davidson v. DallasCalifornia Supreme Court · 1857
  4. Emmolo v. Southern Pacific Co.California Court of Appeal · 1949
  5. Coelho v. TruckellCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1935

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by37 opinions

  1. Samson v. Transamerica InsuranceCalifornia Supreme Court · 1981
  2. Minkler v. Safeco Insurance Co. of AmericaCalifornia Supreme Court · 2010
  3. Droeger v. Friedman, Sloan & RossCalifornia Supreme Court · 1991
  4. Jarvis v. Aetna Casualty & Surety Co.Alaska Supreme Court · 1981
  5. Burnsed v. State Board of ControlCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1987

32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API