Legal Opinion

Rice v. Burgess

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided November 16, 1926No. 17102PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

ESTES, O.

Parties appear in-the same order as in the trial court. Rice sued Burgess and wife and one Kleck, if living, and if dead, his unknown heirs, alleging that on September 3, 1912, he sold to Kleck and conveyed by warranty deed, a certain parcel of realty in |he city of Sapulpa, Okla. The deed recited that:,,

“I, William H. Rice, of the county of Archer, state of Texas, for and in consideration of the sum of $2,600, to me in hand paid, by George W. Kleck. receipt of which is hereby acknowledged, and one note for $200 due and payable to the order of William H. Rice at Dundee,…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Shaw v. DickinsonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1917
  2. Vanselous v. McClellanSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1916

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. State Ex Rel. Commissioners of Land Office v. HallSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1942
  2. Robinson v. EXCHANGE NAT. BANK OF TULSA, OKL.District Court, N.D. Oklahoma · 1939
  3. Electric Supply Co. v. GarlandSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1940
  4. American Investment Co. v. City Savings BankSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1938
  5. Robinson v. EXCHANGE NAT. BANK OF TULSA, OKL.District Court, N.D. Oklahoma · 1940

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API