Legal Opinion
Robinson v. EXCHANGE NAT. BANK OF TULSA, OKL.
District Court, N.D. Oklahoma
Decided February 8, 1940No. 1287PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
FRANKLIN E. KENNAMER, District Judge.
A petition for rehearing brings the instant case on for further consideration. That portion of the opinion announced, is challenged by the petition for review, wherein there is involved the construction of Sec. 10957, O.S.1931, 42 Okl.St.Ann. § 23, which provides that a lien is extinguished by the mere lapse of time within which, under the provision of civil procedure, an action can be brought upon the principal obligation. See, D.C., 28 F.Supp. 244, at page 249.
It has previously been announced that the construction placed on a similiar Statute by…
2Cases cited23 opinions
- Spect v. SpectCalifornia Supreme Court · 1891
- Booth v. HoskinsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1888
- Pierce v. National Bank of CommerceCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1920
- Burns v. HiattCalifornia Supreme Court · 1906
- Gillett v. RomigSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1906
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Miller v. Wells Fargo Bank International Corp.District Court, S.D. New York · 1975
- Hale v. Kontaratos (In Re Kontaratos)United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Maine · 1981