Legal Opinion
Electric Supply Co. v. Garland
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Decided September 24, 1940No. 29289PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtGibson, J.
Plaintiff below appeals from a judgment rendered in favor of defendant below on the former’s action on an open account.
The cause was tried to the court without a jury. Defendant’s plea of limitations was sustained. Whether or not the action was barred thereby is the single question presented here.
The last payment on the account was made in April, 1931. This action was commenced in December, 1936. The action is governed by the three-year statute of limitations. Section 101, O. S. 1931,' 12 Okla. St. Ann. § 95.
Defendant resided in Oklahoma in April, 1931. Thereafter he was out of the state at…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Knupp v. HubbardSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1928
- Gibson v. SimmonsSupreme Court of Kansas · 1908
- James v. WingateSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1937
- Shell Petroleum Corp. v. Town of FairfaxSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1937
- Rice v. BurgessSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1926
3Cited by7 opinions
- Jarchow v. EderSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1967
- D'ANGELO v. Petroleos MexicanosDistrict Court, D. Delaware · 1975
- Drakos v. EdwardsSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1963
- Seval v. HuntSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1947
- Fairfax Nat. Bank v. BurtSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1946
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.