Legal Opinion
Robinson v. EXCHANGE NAT. BANK OF TULSA, OKL.
District Court, N.D. Oklahoma
Decided June 30, 1939No. 1287PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
FRANKLIN E. KENNAMER, District Judge.
James B. Robinson was indebted to the National Bank of Tulsa in the sum of $1,-820.44, and to the Exchange National Bank of Tulsa for $3,022.16, represented by notes dated October 23, 1935. He was also indebted to the defendant R. M. Moody in the sum of $1,000, evidenced by a note dated October 23, 1935, for money borrowed. The notes held by the banks were collateral form notes, providing in substance that certain assets were pledged to secure the payment of the note or any renewal or extension thereof, and of any and all other indebtedness to the bank.…
2Cases cited39 opinions
- Local Loan Co. v. HuntSupreme Court of the United States · 1934
- Zavelo v. ReevesSupreme Court of the United States · 1913
- Everett v. JudsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1913
- Burlingham v. CrouseSupreme Court of the United States · 1913
- Grigsby v. RussellSupreme Court of the United States · 1911
34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Helms v. HolmesCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1942
- Gumina v. DupasLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1965
- Mesa Petroleum Co. v. ConiglioDistrict Court, M.D. Florida · 1982
- In re GuilliotDistrict Court, W.D. Louisiana · 1942
- Robinson v. EXCHANGE NAT. BANK OF TULSA, OKL.District Court, N.D. Oklahoma · 1940
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.