Shaw v. Dickinson
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Error from District Court, Tulsa County; M. A. Breckenridge, Judge. Action by Joseph J. Dickinson against Thos., R. Shaw. Prom a judgment for plaintiff, defendant brings error.
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
RUMMONS, C.
This action was commenced in the superior court of Tulsa county on March 23, 1914, by the defendant in error, hereinafter called plaintiff, against the plaintiff in error, hereinafter called defendant, to recover on a promissory note, dated October 2, 1898, due one year after date. Plaintiff alleged that said note was executed and delivered in the state of Ohio, and that at the time of its execution and delivery both plaintiff and defendant were residents of the state of Ohio. Plaintiff further pleads that at said time, and at all times since said date, the statutes of…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Hoggett v. EmersonSupreme Court of Kansas · 1871
- Doughty v. FunkSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1905
- Richardson v. MacKaySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1896
- Vanselous v. McClellanSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1916
- Gaier & Stroh Millinery Co. v. HillikerSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1915
3Cited by12 opinions
- Brown v. CaseSupreme Court of Florida · 1920
- Owens v. ClarkSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1931
- Western Natural Gas Co. v. Cities Service Gas Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1972
- Torrey v. CampbellSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1918
- Clark v. KeithSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1924
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.