Legal Opinion

State Ex Rel. Johnson v. Public Utilities Commission

South Dakota Supreme Court

Decided January 22, 1986No. 14908, 14919PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HERTZ, Acting Justice.

Appellants appeal from the trial court’s denial of a writ of certiorari in which they contended that the Public Utilities Commission (P.U.C.), appellee, exceeded its jurisdiction by entering into a settlement agreement with Northwestern Bell Telephone Company (Northwestern Bell), appellee-in-tervenor. Additionally, the P.U.C. has filed a notice of review from the trial court’s final order which denied it recovery of costs. We affirm in all respects.

Commencing in the early 1970’s and prior to November 17, 1980, Northwestern Bell Telephone Company sold decorator telephone…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Save Centennial Valley Ass'n, Inc. v. SchultzSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1979
  2. Barnum v. EwingSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1928
  3. Application of Northern States Power Co.South Dakota Supreme Court · 1983
  4. Walker v. Bd. of County Com'rs of BruleSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1983

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. In Re the Petition for Writ of Certiorari as to the Wrongful Payments of Attorney Fees Made by the Brookings School District School BoardSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2003
  2. Adolph v. Grant County Board of AdjustmentSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2017
  3. Dunham v. Lake Cty. CommissionSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2020
  4. Stanton v. Hills Materials Co.South Dakota Supreme Court · 1996
  5. In Re the Petition for Writ of Certiorari as to the Wrongful Payments of Attorney Fees Made by the Brookings School District School BoardSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2003

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API