Legal Opinion

Adolph v. Grant County Board of Adjustment

South Dakota Supreme Court

Decided March 1, 2017No. 27884PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtGilbertson, Chief Justice

[¶ 1.] Geraldine and Barth Adolph appeal the circuit court’s affirmance of the Grant County Board of Adjustment’s decision to approve Dustin Nelson’s application for a conditional-use permit to construct a concentrated animal-feeding operation (CAFO). Adolphs argue that Nelson’s proposed project violates the Zoning Ordinance for Grant County (the ZOGC) and that consequently, the Board’s decision was illegal. Adolphs also argue Nelson presented a new waste-disposal plan at the public hearing, denying them an opportunity to voice their concerns. Finally, Adolphs claim the Board was biased…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Andrews v. Ridco & Twin City Fire Ins. Co.South Dakota Supreme Court · 2015
  2. Duffy v. Circuit Court for the Seventh Judicial CircuitSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2004
  3. Jensen v. TURNER COUNTY BOARD OF ADJUSTMENTSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2007
  4. Hanig v. City of WinnerSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2005
  5. Armstrong v. Turner County Board of AdjustmentSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2009

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Madetzke v. DooleySouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2018
  2. Dunham v. Lake Cty. CommissionSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2020
  3. Powers v. Turner Cnty.South Dakota Supreme Court · 2020
  4. Miles v. Spink County Board of AdjustmentSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2022
  5. Powers v. Turner County Board of AdjustmentSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2022

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API