Legal Opinion

Stanton v. Hills Materials Co.

South Dakota Supreme Court

Decided August 28, 1996No. NonePublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

AMUNDSON, Justice.

Hills Materials Company and Maryland Casualty Company (Employer) appeal a lump-sum award of attorney fees to Emlon L. Stanton (Employee), which was granted without notice to them. Employee filed a notice of review as to the denial of prejudgment interest. We reverse the award of lump-sum attorney fees and remand for rehearing on this issue.

PACTS

Employee was a seasonal construction worker for Employer. On or about June 18, 1991, Employee sustained a back injury while operating a bulldozer for Employer. This injury did not prevent Employee from continuing his work. Around…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Barnum v. EwingSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1928
  2. Tri County Landfill Ass'n v. Brule CountySouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1995
  3. Application of Northern States Power Co.South Dakota Supreme Court · 1983
  4. Keogan v. BerghSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1984
  5. Commonwealth, Department of Highways v. CombsCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1962

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Enger v. FMCSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2000
  2. Lagge v. Corsica Co-OpSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2004
  3. Stuckey v. Sturgis Pizza RanchSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2011
  4. Stanton v. Hills Materials Co.South Dakota Supreme Court · 1996

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API