Legal Opinion

In Re the Petition for Writ of Certiorari as to the Wrongful Payments of Attorney Fees Made by the Brookings School District School Board

South Dakota Supreme Court

Decided August 13, 2003No. NonePublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ZINTER, Justice.

[¶ 1.] Craig Culver, Leon Pesall, Marcia Williams, Henry Williams, Robert Thorson, Hugh Barnett, Robert Schwartz and Diane Culver (Taxpayers) obtained a writ of certiorari setting aside a Brookings School. Board (Board) payment of legal fees. The Board had reimbursed two private citizens for the legal fees they incurred in their private legal action to overturn a decision of a school election recount board. The circuit court granted the writ, concluding that the Board’s reimbursement of private attorney fees was in excess of its authority. We hold that, under the spécifíc…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Peters v. Spearfish ETJ Planning CommissionSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1997
  2. Agar School District 58-1 Board of Education v. McGeeSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1995
  3. Haas v. Independent School District No. 1South Dakota Supreme Court · 1943
  4. Hamerly v. City of Lennox Bd. of Adj.South Dakota Supreme Court · 1998
  5. Austin v. EddySouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1919

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Pucket v. Hot Springs School District No. 23-2Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2008
  2. Toft v. ToftSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2006
  3. Schaefer Ex Rel. S.S. v. LiechtiSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2006
  4. In Re Estate of SeefeldtSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2006
  5. Lamar Outdoor Advertising of South Dakota, Inc. v. City of Rapid CitySouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2007

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API