Legal Opinion

People v. Nieves

New York Court of Appeals

Decided March 25, 1986PublishedCited by 159 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

Chief Judge Wachtler.

Defendant, Angel Nieves, was convicted after a jury trial of manslaughter in the second degree (Penal Law § 125.15 [1]). The evidence at trial establishing his guilt consisted almost entirely of statements made by the victim of a stabbing shortly before she died. The issue on this appeal is whether these statements were admissible at trial pursuant to the "dying declarations” exception to the general rule prohibiting the use of hearsay evidence. We conclude that the statements do not qualify as dying declarations, and we also reject the attempt by the…

2Cases cited29 opinions

  1. Ohio v. RobertsSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
  2. California v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
  3. Mattox v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1895
  4. People v. MaliziaNew York Court of Appeals · 1984
  5. Shepard v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1933

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by159 opinions

  1. People v. EvansNew York Court of Appeals · 2000
  2. People v. BrownNew York Court of Appeals · 1987
  3. People v. BrensicNew York Court of Appeals · 1987
  4. People v. KennedyNew York Court of Appeals · 1986
  5. People v. ScottNew York Court of Appeals · 1987

154 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API