Legal Opinion
People v. Malizia
New York Court of Appeals
Decided May 10, 1984PublishedCited by 852 opinions
APPEARANCES OF COUNSEL
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
Memorandum.
The order of the Appellate Division should be affirmed (see 92 AD2d 154).
On this appeal, defendant contends the evidence of guilt is insufficient, particularly because of the lack of credibility of Harry Terrell, the People’s principal witness, and that the trial court committed reversible error in several evidentiary rulings.
After an earlier trial had resulted in a hung jury, defendant was convicted in a second trial of felony murder (robbery) and common-law murder resulting in the death of William Terrell and of the attempted murder and assault, first degree,…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- People v. CrimminsNew York Court of Appeals · 1975
- Mutual Life Insurance v. HillmonSupreme Court of the United States · 1892
- People v. KennedyNew York Court of Appeals · 1979
- People v. GruttolaNew York Court of Appeals · 1977
- People v. HughesNew York Court of Appeals · 1983
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by852 opinions
- People v. CableNew York Court of Appeals · 1984
- People v. FordNew York Court of Appeals · 1985
- People v. EvansNew York Court of Appeals · 2000
- State v. TerrovonaWashington Supreme Court · 1986
- People v. NievesNew York Court of Appeals · 1986
847 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.