Legal Opinion

People v. Brown

New York Court of Appeals

Decided November 19, 1987PublishedCited by 201 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

*515OPINION OF THE COURT

Hancock, Jr., J.

In his appeal from a conviction for second degree murder, defendant’s chief contention is that the trial court committed reversible error in admitting testimony of several incriminating statements of the victim as excited utterances. Errol O’Neil was shot at approximately 2:00 p.m. on October 2, 1981 following an argument in the basement apartment of a two-family dwelling in Brooklyn where he resided with various relatives including his mother, Joyce Scott, and an uncle, Robert Hinds. We readily agree with the courts below that it was proper to admit the…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. People v. EdwardsNew York Court of Appeals · 1979
  2. People v. MarksNew York Court of Appeals · 1959
  3. People v. NievesNew York Court of Appeals · 1986
  4. People v. CavinessNew York Court of Appeals · 1975
  5. People v. . Del VermoNew York Court of Appeals · 1908

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by201 opinions

  1. People v. VasquezNew York Court of Appeals · 1996
  2. People v. BrownNew York Court of Appeals · 1993
  3. People v. BuieNew York Court of Appeals · 1995
  4. People v. JohnsonNew York Court of Appeals · 2003
  5. People v. CottoNew York Court of Appeals · 1998

196 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API