Legal Opinion

Doyle v. McPherson

California Court of Appeal

Decided December 13, 1939No. Civ. 10892PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtNourse, P. J.

Plaintiffs, partners doing business under the name of Doyle-Feeney Co., brought the present action against defendant, stating two causes of action—the first upon an open and current book account and the second upon an account stated—to recover the balance due upon a brokerage account. Defendant pleaded the statute of limitations and counterclaimed for damages allegedly suffered by reason of plaintiffs’ negligence in the sale of collateral security, and pleaded a misjoinder of parties plaintiff. The cause was tried with a jury and the verdict was in favor of plaintiffs for $1500. Thereupon…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Pike v. ZadigCalifornia Supreme Court · 1915

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Ward Manufacturing Co. v. MileyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1955
  2. Smith v. RandallCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1942
  3. Fortier Transportation Co. v. Union Packing Co.California Court of Appeal · 1950
  4. Thurman v. CluneCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1942
  5. Joseph O'Bryne v. Portfolio Recovery AssociatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2015

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API