Legal Opinion
Thurman v. Ice Palace
California Court of Appeal
Decided December 29, 1939No. Civ. 12336PublishedCited by 14 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtMcCOMB, J.
From a judgment in favor of defendants predicated upon the granting of their motion for a directed verdict in an action to recover damages for personal injuries caused by the alleged negligence of defendants, plaintiffs appeal.
There is also a motion of defendants Alfred Fitzgerald, Jerome Beranek, Fergus Rowland, Nathaniel Harty, Earl Robson, Howard Smith, Benny Novicki, L. A. Armstrong, John Mariueci, John Hokanson, Ray H. Wallace, Loane Randall, and Richard Kroll to dismiss the appeal or affirm the judgment as to them.
The essential facts are:
March 24, 1938, Mary Katherine Thurman, aged…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Cincinnati Base Ball Club Co. v. EnoOhio Supreme Court · 1925
- Quinn v. Recreation Park Assn.California Supreme Court · 1935
- Brisson v. Minneapolis Baseball & Athletic Ass'nSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1932
- Wells v. Minneapolis Baseball & Athletic Ass'nSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1913
- Ingersoll v. Onondaga Hockey Club, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1935
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- Lasell v. Tri-States Theatre Corp.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1943
- Tite v. Omaha Coliseum Corp.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1943
- Tavernier v. MaesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1966
- Aldes v. St. Paul Ball Club, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1958
- Shurman v. Fresno Ice Rink Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1949
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.