Williams v. Van Pelt
New Mexico Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
SIMMS, J.
After a rehearing, we have concluded to withdraw the original opinion, and it is so ordered.
In the year 1919, one James W. Tinkle received from the government a patent to the land here involved. It was assessable for taxation for the year 1920, but he failed to return it. The assessor made up the- roll and placed thereon the land in question, with penalty for nonrendition, and delivered the roll to the treasurer. Pie failed to “take, subscribe and attach” to the roll the oath required by section 5464, Code 1915. The taxes were not paid. By chapter 133, Laws of…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Manby v. VoorheesNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1921
- Board of Com'rs of Garfield Co. v. FieldSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1916
- Pace v. WightNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1918
- Mining v. Territory of ArizonaArizona Supreme Court · 1906
- State ex rel. Howard v. Estate of TimbrookSupreme Court of Missouri · 1912
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by19 opinions
- Taos County Board of Education v. SedilloNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1940
- Cano v. LovatoNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1986
- Kershner v. SganziniNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1941
- State v. ThomsonNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1969
- N. H. Ranch Co. v. GannNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1938
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.