Legal Opinion

Manby v. Voorhees

New Mexico Supreme Court

Decided December 23, 1921No. 2022PublishedCited by 30 opinions

Appeal from District Court, Taos County; Leib, Judge. Action by A. R. Manby and others against A. C. Voorhees and others. Judgment for plaintiffs, and defendants appeal.

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT.

PARKER, J.

The appellee, A. R. Manby, brought suit in the district court for Taos county against Daniel Martinez and others to quiet title to the Antonio Martinez land grant. ,From a judgment in his favor the persons hereinafter named as appellants have perfected this appeal.

The complaint of appellee Manby alleged in substance that the lands within the Antonio Martinez grant were granted by Spanish authority in 1716 to Antonio Martiiiez and his heirs and assigns; that it was confirmed in 1892, and patent therefor was issued by the United States in 1897; that ap-pellee is…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Maxwell Land Grant Co. v. DawsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1894
  2. Grant v. BartholomewNebraska Supreme Court · 1899
  3. Probst v. Trustees of the Board of Domestic Missions of the General Assembly of the Presbyterian ChurchSupreme Court of the United States · 1889
  4. Palomares Land Co. v. County of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1905
  5. Lyman v. City of PhiladelphiaSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1868

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by30 opinions

  1. Christmas v. CowdenNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1940
  2. Southern Union Gas Co. v. CantrellNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1952
  3. Cano v. LovatoNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1986
  4. N. H. Ranch Co. v. GannNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1938
  5. Bland v. Greenfield Gin Co.New Mexico Supreme Court · 1944

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API