Legal Opinion

State v. Thomson

New Mexico Supreme Court

Decided January 20, 1969No. 8564PublishedCited by 22 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

CARMODY, Justice.

The defendants appeal from the trial court’s decree quieting title in the State. Although the case was initially instituted by the Capitol Building Improvement Commission, the State itself has been substituted as the proper party, appellee.

The trial was upon stipulated facts, and, inasmuch as the appellants (whom we will hereafter refer to as “Thomson”) make divergent attacks upon the findings made by the court, we will summarize the stipulated facts insofar as they are necessary for decision, rather than refer to the findings themselves.

The New Mexico Penitentiary was…

2Cases cited28 opinions

  1. Martinez v. Research Park, Inc.New Mexico Supreme Court · 1965
  2. State v. IngallsNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1913
  3. State Ex Rel. State Park & Recreation Commission v. New Mexico State AuthorityNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1966
  4. Chicago Home for Girls v. CarrIllinois Supreme Court · 1921
  5. Mugaas v. SmithWashington Supreme Court · 1949

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by22 opinions

  1. State v. RamseurSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1987
  2. Stang v. Hertz CorporationNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1970
  3. State v. HerreraNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1974
  4. Witcher v. Capitan Drilling CompanyNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1972
  5. State v. HouseNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 2001

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API