State v. Thomson
New Mexico Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
CARMODY, Justice.
The defendants appeal from the trial court’s decree quieting title in the State. Although the case was initially instituted by the Capitol Building Improvement Commission, the State itself has been substituted as the proper party, appellee.
The trial was upon stipulated facts, and, inasmuch as the appellants (whom we will hereafter refer to as “Thomson”) make divergent attacks upon the findings made by the court, we will summarize the stipulated facts insofar as they are necessary for decision, rather than refer to the findings themselves.
The New Mexico Penitentiary was…
2Cases cited28 opinions
- Martinez v. Research Park, Inc.New Mexico Supreme Court · 1965
- State v. IngallsNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1913
- State Ex Rel. State Park & Recreation Commission v. New Mexico State AuthorityNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1966
- Chicago Home for Girls v. CarrIllinois Supreme Court · 1921
- Mugaas v. SmithWashington Supreme Court · 1949
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by22 opinions
- State v. RamseurSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1987
- Stang v. Hertz CorporationNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1970
- State v. HerreraNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1974
- Witcher v. Capitan Drilling CompanyNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1972
- State v. HouseNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 2001
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.