Legal Opinion
Taos County Board of Education v. Sedillo
New Mexico Supreme Court
Decided April 9, 1940No. 4507PublishedCited by 37 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
SADLER, Justice.
This is a suit for declaratory judgment filed by the Board of Education of Taos County against Filo M. Sedillo, as Attorney General of the State of New Mexico, to test the merits of his refusal to approve proceedings authorizing bond issues for the purpose of erecting and furnishing school buildings in each of four school districts in Taos County, namely, Rural School Districts Numbered 6, 7, 12 and 13. In conformity with the requirements of 1929 Comp., §§ 120-713 and 120-715, both inclusive, a transcript in triplicate of the proceedings in each district was duly prepared by…
2Cases cited44 opinions
- Aetna Life Insurance v. HaworthSupreme Court of the United States · 1937
- Coleman v. MillerSupreme Court of the United States · 1939
- Dun & Bradstreet, Inc. v. City of New YorkNew York Court of Appeals · 1937
- Anway v. Grand Rapids Railway Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1920
- Weinberger v. Board of Public InstructionSupreme Court of Florida · 1927
39 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by37 opinions
- Cole-Collister Fire Protection District v. City of BoiseIdaho Supreme Court · 1970
- Mowrer v. RuskNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1980
- State Ex Rel. Overton v. New Mexico State Tax CommissionNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1969
- State Ex Rel. Stratton v. Roswell Independent SchoolsNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1991
- Boise City v. Better Homes, Inc.Idaho Supreme Court · 1952
32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.