Sellers v. Friedrich Refrigerators, Inc.
Supreme Court of North Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
MOORE, Justice.
The determinative question is: Is an action by plaintiffs, owners in possession of real property, against manufacturer and contractor for negligent manufacture and installation of heating and cooling equipment on the real property governed by G.S. 1-52 (5), the three-year statute of limitations, or by G.S. 1-50 (5), the six-year statute?
G.S. 1-52(5) provides a three-year statute of limitations “for criminal conversation, or for any other injury to the person or rights of another, not arising on contract and not hereafter enumerated.” The parties have stipulated that the instal…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Shearin v. LloydSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1957
- Jewell v. PriceSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1965
- Matthieu v. Piedmont Natural Gas CompanySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1967
- Thurston Motor Lines, Inc. v. General Motors Corp.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1962
- Galligan v. Town of Chapel HillSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1970
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by23 opinions
- Lamb v. Wedgewood South Corp.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1983
- North Carolina State Ports Authority v. Lloyd A. Fry Roofing Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1978
- Romano v. Westinghouse Electric Co.Supreme Court of Rhode Island · 1975
- Carolina Environmental Study Group, Inc. v. United States Atomic Energy CommissionDistrict Court, W.D. North Carolina · 1977
- North Carolina State Ports Authority v. Lloyd A. Fry Roofing Co.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1977
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.