Legal Opinion
Lamb v. Wedgewood South Corp.
Supreme Court of North Carolina
Decided May 31, 1983No. 156A82PublishedCited by 190 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
EXUM, Justice.
The principal questions presented in this appeal involve the interpretation of General Statute 1-50Í5) 1 and whether the statute is constitutional. We conclude that the statute bars all claims asserted in this case against defendant architects and that the statute is constitutional. We also conclude that the Court of Appeals should not have considered certain denials of motions for summary judgment made by some defendants.
Plaintiff is the widow of Thomas Wade Lamb, M.D. and the duly appointed executor of his estate. Dr. Lamb was a registered guest at the Hilton Inn in…
2Cases cited58 opinions
- Duke Power Co. v. Carolina Environmental Study Group, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Silver v. SilverSupreme Court of the United States · 1929
- Pritchard v. NortonSupreme Court of the United States · 1882
- Rosenberg v. Town of North BergenSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1972
- Klein v. CatalanoMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1982
53 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by190 opinions
- Arnold G. Barwick v. The Celotex Corporation, Keene Corporation, Pittsburgh Corning Corporation, H.K. Porter, Forty-Eight Insulations, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1984
- Corum v. University of North CarolinaSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1992
- Boudreau v. BaughmanSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1988
- Oates v. Jag, Inc.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1985
- Trinity River Authority v. URS Consultants, Inc.Texas Supreme Court · 1994
185 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.