Matthieu v. Piedmont Natural Gas Company
Supreme Court of North Carolina
1Opinion of the CourtBranch, J.
The sole question presented for decision is: Did the trial judge err in allowing original defendant’s motion for non-suit? It is stipulated by counsel that the cases be consolidated for the purpose of appeal. The plaintiffs have abandoned all causes of action in their complaint except the action for negligent inspection. In filing its responsive pleadings, the original defendant pled the three-year statute of limitations in bar of plaintiffs’ right of recovery. The period prescribed for the commencement of this action is three years from the time the cause of action accrued. G.S. 1-52. Upon…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Shearin v. LloydSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1957
- Boddie v. BondSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1911
- Jewell v. PriceSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1965
- Nowell v. Great Atlantic & Pacific Tea CompanySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1959
- McNeely Ex Rel. McNeely v. WaltersSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1937
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by57 opinions
- Pembee Mfg. Corp. v. Cape Fear Const. Co., Inc.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1985
- Lamb v. Wedgewood South Corp.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1983
- North Carolina State Ports Authority v. Lloyd A. Fry Roofing Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1978
- Christenbury Eye Ctr., P.A. v. Medflow, Inc.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 2017
- Duke v. HousenWyoming Supreme Court · 1979
52 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.