Legal Opinion

Brown v. Colm

California Supreme Court

Decided June 7, 1974No. Sac. 7999PublishedCited by 67 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

MOSK, J.

In 1968, plaintiffs, who are husband and wife, filed a malpractice action alleging defendant had been negligent in performing surgery upon plaintiff wife in 1949. The trial court refused to permit an expert witness to testify as to the standard of care prevailing in 1949, on the ground that the witness was not personally acquainted with the medical standards of that year since he had not been admitted to practice until several years thereafter, and his opinion was based upon a study of medical literature. We conclude that this ruling was erroneous.

In July 1949, while plaintiff…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Meiselman v. Crown Heights Hospital, Inc.New York Court of Appeals · 1941
  2. Seneris v. HaasCalifornia Supreme Court · 1955
  3. Huffman v. LindquistCalifornia Supreme Court · 1951
  4. Sinz v. OwensCalifornia Supreme Court · 1949
  5. Bardessono v. MichelsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1970

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by67 opinions

  1. People v. McDonaldCalifornia Supreme Court · 1984
  2. People v. MurtishawCalifornia Supreme Court · 1981
  3. Mann v. CracchioloCalifornia Supreme Court · 1985
  4. People v. HoganCalifornia Supreme Court · 1982
  5. People v. MaloneCalifornia Supreme Court · 1988

62 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API