Legal Opinion

Cross v. Pacific Gas & Electric Co.

California Supreme Court

Decided January 28, 1964No. Sac. 7500PublishedCited by 86 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMcCOMB, J.

Plaintiffs appeal from a judgment of dismissal, predicated upon the sustaining of a demurrer to their complaint in an action to recover damages for the wrongful death of their father.

Facts: The complaint alleged that in February 1956 George Cross was electrocuted as the result of a contact with an electrical line maintained by defendant Pacific Gas and Electric Company (hereinafter referred to as “defendant”). He was survived by his widow and three minor children.

In November 1961 plaintiffs, decedent’s minor children, brought this action through their guardian ad litem, (their mother),…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Leeper v. BeltramiCalifornia Supreme Court · 1959
  2. Salmon v. RathjensCalifornia Supreme Court · 1907
  3. Bartolozzi v. MallegniCalifornia Supreme Court · 1921
  4. Flores v. BrownCalifornia Supreme Court · 1952
  5. Watkins v. NuttingCalifornia Supreme Court · 1941

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by86 opinions

  1. Horwich v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1999
  2. Pasquale v. Speed Products EngineeringIllinois Supreme Court · 1995
  3. De Jesús Martínez v. ChardónSupreme Court of Puerto Rico · 1985
  4. Morgan v. County of YubaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1964
  5. Canavin v. Pacific Southwest AirlinesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1983

81 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API