Legal Opinion

Kahn v. Triest-Rosenberg Cap Co.

California Supreme Court

Decided June 19, 1903No. S.F. No. 2735PublishedCited by 33 opinions

The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the CourtShaw, J.

This is an action for damages to certain goods of the plaintiffs while situated in a room on the first floor of a building in San Francisco, alleged to have been caused by the flooding of the .premises with water which escaped from an ■engine operated by the defendants upon an upper floor in the same building. The defendant is charged with negligence in ¿the selection, management, and control of said engine and the boiler and pipes connected therewith. The answer denies the damage and the negligence on the part of the defendant. The cause was tried by a jury, and a verdict rendered in favor…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Judson v. Giant Powder Co.California Supreme Court · 1895
  2. Butcher v. Vaca Valley & Clear Lake RailroadCalifornia Supreme Court · 1885

3Cited by33 opinions

  1. Zentz v. Coca Cola Bottling Co.California Supreme Court · 1952
  2. Salmon v. RathjensCalifornia Supreme Court · 1907
  3. Michener v. HuttonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1928
  4. O'Connor v. MennieCalifornia Supreme Court · 1915
  5. Smith v. O'DonnellCalifornia Supreme Court · 1932

28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API