Legal Opinion

Schilling v. Roux Distributing Co. Inc.

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided July 24, 1953No. 36,018PublishedCited by 21 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Knutson, Justice.

Appeal from an order of the district court denying defendant’s motion to dismiss the action for lack of jurisdiction and denying defendant’s alternative .motion for judgment notwithstanding the verdict or for a new trial after a verdict by the jury in favor of plaintiff.

The action originally was commenced against Roux Distributing Co., Inc., Stuart’s Beauty Supplies, and Walgreen Company, a corporation. Prior to the submission of the case to the jury it was dismissed as to Stuart’s Beauty Supplies and Walgreen Company, so that when we refer to defendant herein we have…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. International Shoe Co. v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
  2. Travelers Health Assn. v. Virginia Ex Rel. State Corporation Comm'nSupreme Court of the United States · 1950
  3. Bank of Augusta v. EarleSupreme Court of the United States · 1839
  4. International Harvester Co. of America v. KentuckySupreme Court of the United States · 1914
  5. Green v. Chicago, Burlington & Quincy Railway Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1907

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by21 opinions

  1. McCormack v. Hankscraft CompanySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1967
  2. Beck v. SpindlerSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1959
  3. Hartmon v. National Heater Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1953
  4. Braun v. Roux Distributing CompanySupreme Court of Missouri · 1958
  5. State Ex Rel. Coral Pools, Inc. v. KnappWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1963

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API