Legal Opinion

Braun v. Roux Distributing Company

Supreme Court of Missouri

Decided April 14, 1958No. 45770PublishedCited by 41 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BARRETT, Commissioner.

Upon the allegation of negligence in failure to warn of the presence of a toxic ingredient, paraphenylenediamine, in its hair dye, resulting in allergic periarteritis nodosa, the plaintiff, Vernell Braun, has recovered a judgment against the distributor, Roux Distributing Company, in the sum of $85,000.

Mrs. Braun, age 38 in 1956, is a housewife, the mother of two children, ages five and three. She attended a beauty college in 1934 and was an “all-around” beauty operator for two and one half years, and for about fifteen years operated a power machine in a shoe factory —…

Also in this document: Per curiam.

2Cases cited27 opinions

  1. Cruce v. Gulf, Mobile & Ohio RailroadSupreme Court of Missouri · 1951
  2. Counts v. ThompsonSupreme Court of Missouri · 1949
  3. Craddock v. Greenberg Mercantile, Inc.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1957
  4. Berkemeier v. RellerSupreme Court of Missouri · 1927
  5. Willey v. Fyrogas Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1952

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by41 opinions

  1. Davis v. Wyeth Laboratories, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1968
  2. Otto E. Pritchard v. Liggett & Myers Tobacco CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1961
  3. Sterling Drug, Inc., a Corporation v. Maxine F. CornishCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1967
  4. Sampson v. Missouri Pacific RailroadSupreme Court of Missouri · 1978
  5. Krug v. Sterling Drug, Inc.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1967

36 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API