Braun v. Roux Distributing Company
Supreme Court of Missouri
1Opinion of the Court
BARRETT, Commissioner.
Upon the allegation of negligence in failure to warn of the presence of a toxic ingredient, paraphenylenediamine, in its hair dye, resulting in allergic periarteritis nodosa, the plaintiff, Vernell Braun, has recovered a judgment against the distributor, Roux Distributing Company, in the sum of $85,000.
Mrs. Braun, age 38 in 1956, is a housewife, the mother of two children, ages five and three. She attended a beauty college in 1934 and was an “all-around” beauty operator for two and one half years, and for about fifteen years operated a power machine in a shoe factory —…
Also in this document: Per curiam.
2Cases cited27 opinions
- Cruce v. Gulf, Mobile & Ohio RailroadSupreme Court of Missouri · 1951
- Counts v. ThompsonSupreme Court of Missouri · 1949
- Craddock v. Greenberg Mercantile, Inc.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1957
- Berkemeier v. RellerSupreme Court of Missouri · 1927
- Willey v. Fyrogas Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1952
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by41 opinions
- Davis v. Wyeth Laboratories, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1968
- Otto E. Pritchard v. Liggett & Myers Tobacco CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1961
- Sterling Drug, Inc., a Corporation v. Maxine F. CornishCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1967
- Sampson v. Missouri Pacific RailroadSupreme Court of Missouri · 1978
- Krug v. Sterling Drug, Inc.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1967
36 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.