Legal Opinion

Callaghan v. Brown

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided November 10, 1944No. 33,841PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Loring, Chief Justice.

The relator petitioned the industrial commission for compensation under the workmen’s compensation act for the death of her husband. The referee and the commission found for the employer and its insurer. A writ of certiorari issued from this court to review the decision.

Eelator’s husband worked as a fireman in the Lonsdale Building at Duluth. His principal duty was to fire the boiler. None of his duties took him outside the building, but because of the nature of his work he often had some free time. It had become his habit, acquiesced in by. his employer, to leave the…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Novack v. Montgomery Ward & Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1924
  2. Dreyfus & Co. v. MeadeSupreme Court of Virginia · 1925
  3. Industrial Commission v. AhernOhio Supreme Court · 1928
  4. Metropolitan Life Ins. v. ContieOhio Supreme Court · 1928
  5. Claim of Bollard v. EngelAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1938

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Gibberd Ex Rel. Gibberd v. Control Data Corp.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1988
  2. Locke v. County of SteeleSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1947
  3. Johannsen v. ACTION CONSTRUCTION CO. INC.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1963
  4. Sweet v. KoloskySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1960
  5. Krause v. Western Casualty & Surety Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1958

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API