Legal Opinion
Patterson v. Central Mills, Inc.
District Court, N.D. Ohio
Decided August 21, 2000No. 3:98CV7083PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
CARR, District Judge.
This is a diversity case in which Plaintiff Maurice Patterson was severely injured when his shirt caught fire. Pending are Defendant Central Mills, Inc-’s (“Central Mills”) motion for summary judgment (Doc. 66), Defendant Time Warner Entertainment Company, L.P.’s (“Warner”) motion for summary judgment (Doc. 110), and Defendant Meijer, Inc.’s (“Meijer”) motion for summary judgment (Doc. 111). For the following reasons, Central Mills’s motion shall be granted in part and denied in part, Warner’s motion shall be granted, and Meijer’s motion shall be granted in part and…
2Cases cited30 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Temple v. Wean United, Inc.Ohio Supreme Court · 1977
- Eastman Kodak Co. v. Image Technical Services, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1992
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Miller v. Alza Corp.District Court, S.D. Ohio · 2010
- Vail v. KMart Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2006
- Krumpelbeck v. Breg, Inc.District Court, S.D. Ohio · 2010
- Gumnitsky v. Delta International MacHinery Corp.District Court, N.D. Ohio · 2005
- RIEDER v. ASTRAZENECA PHARMACEUTICALS LPDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 2022
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.