Legal Opinion
Miller v. Alza Corp.
District Court, S.D. Ohio
Decided December 17, 2010No. 2:08-cv-00402PublishedCited by 19 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
DECISION AND ENTRY GRANTING DEFENDANT’S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT IN PART AND DENYING IN PART (Doc. 19)
TIMOTHY S. BLACK, District Judge.
This civil case is presently before the Court on the Motion of Defendants, ALZA Corporation (“ALZA”) and Sandoz, Inc. (“Sandoz”), requesting summary judgment on all of Plaintiffs claims pursuant to Fed. R.Civ.P. 56. (Doc. 19). Plaintiff filed a Response to Defendants’ Motion (Doc. 46) and Defendants filed a Reply Memorandum. (Doc. 48). The matter is now ripe for decision.
I. FACTS
This case concerns the death of 51 year-old Cornell Phillips. At the time of…
2Cases cited29 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Buckman Co. v. Plaintiffs' Legal CommitteeSupreme Court of the United States · 2001
- Seley v. G. D. Searle & Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 1981
- State Farm Fire & Casualty Co. v. Chrysler Corp.Ohio Supreme Court · 1988
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by19 opinions
- Bosch v. Bayer Healthcare Pharmaceuticals, Inc.District Court, W.D. Kentucky · 2014
- Monroe v. Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corp.District Court, S.D. Ohio · 2014
- Jones v. Staübli Motor Sports Division of Staübli American Corp.District Court, S.D. Ohio · 2012
- Parker v. ACE Hardware Corp., Court of Appeals of Ohio, Second District, Champaign County2018
- Rheinfrank v. Abbott Laboratories, Inc.District Court, S.D. Ohio · 2015
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.