Legal Opinion

Krumpelbeck v. Breg, Inc.

District Court, S.D. Ohio

Decided December 27, 2010No. 1:09-cv-00091PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER THAT: (1) DEFENDANT BREG, INC.’S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT (Doc. 49) BE GRANTED; AND (2) THIS CASE BE CLOSED

TIMOTHY S. BLACK, District Judge.

This civil action is before the Court on Defendant Breg, Inc.’s motion for summary judgment (Doc. 49) and the parties’ responsive memoranda (Docs. 52, 63, 64, 71).

I. BACKGROUND FACTS

Plaintiff underwent arthroscopic surgery on her shoulder. After the surgery, her physician prescribed and implanted the catheter of a Breg Pain Care infusion pump to administer local anesthetic for pain control. Plaintiff alleges that as a result of the pump, she…

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  4. Tamraz v. Lincoln Electric Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2010
  5. Douglas C. Kilpatrick v. Breg, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2010

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Rodriguez v. Stryker Corp.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2012
  2. Monroe v. Zimmer U.S. Inc.District Court, E.D. California · 2011
  3. Kildow v. BREG, INC.District Court, D. Oregon · 2011
  4. Mack v. Stryker Corp.District Court, D. Minnesota · 2012
  5. Schoenborn v. Stryker Corp.District Court, D. Oregon · 2011

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API