Estate of Arbuckle
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the Court
VALLÉE, J.
Appeal by Stuart N. West from a judgment dismissing a proceeding instituted by him to revoke the probate of a will. The contest was dismissed on the ground that West was not an interested person entitled to contest the will under Probate Code, section 380.
West, not an heir at law of decedent, bases his right to contest the will on the ground he is the principal beneficiary under a prior will and codicil, executed by Pearl P. Arbuckle, decedent, which will, together with the codicil, was destroyed. in 1943 or 1944, during decedent’s lifetime, without her knowledge or consent.
Mrs.…
2Cases cited48 opinions
- In Re Estate of CoverCalifornia Supreme Court · 1922
- McDonald v. McDonaldIndiana Supreme Court · 1895
- Kennedy v. WalcuttOhio Supreme Court · 1928
- Morrison v. LandCalifornia Supreme Court · 1913
- Estate of PattersonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1909
43 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by56 opinions
- Schock v. NashSupreme Court of Delaware · 1999
- Bethlahmy v. BechtelIdaho Supreme Court · 1966
- Stanley v. Sewell Coal Co.West Virginia Supreme Court · 1982
- Twomey v. Mitchum, Jones & Templeton, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1968
- Michelson v. HamadaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1994
51 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.