Legal Opinion

Devereaux v. Blanchard

Washington Supreme Court

Decided October 26, 1933No. 24487. En BancPublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBlake, J.

Plaintiff brought this action to recover damages for personal injuries sustained in a collision of automobiles owned by defendants Blanchard and Davis, respectively. Plaintiff was a guest in the Blanchard car, which was being driven by Mr. Blanchard. Mrs. Davis was driving* their car. At the close of plaintiff’s case, the court sustained a challenge to the sufficiency of the evidence, interposed by defendants Blanchard. The trial proceeded as against defendants Davis, and resulted in a verdict in their favor. Prom a judgment entered in favor of the defendants, plaintiff appeals.

The collision…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Heg v. MullenWashington Supreme Court · 1921
  2. Adair v. NewkirkWashington Supreme Court · 1928
  3. State of Washington v. WingardWashington Supreme Court · 1916
  4. Davidson Fruit Co. v. Produce Distributors Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1913
  5. Dawson v. FosterWashington Supreme Court · 1932

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Nist v. TudorWashington Supreme Court · 1965
  2. Meath v. Northern Pacific Railway Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1934
  3. Carson v. TalbotIdaho Supreme Court · 1942
  4. Nenezich v. ElichWashington Supreme Court · 1935
  5. Nist v. TudorWashington Supreme Court · 1965

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API