Legal Opinion

Davidson Fruit Co. v. Produce Distributors Co.

Washington Supreme Court

Decided August 5, 1913No. 11221PublishedCited by 15 opinions

Appeal from a judgment of the superior court for King county, Tallman, J., entered December 81, 1918, upon the verdict of a jury rendered in favor of the plaintiff, in an action on contract.

1Opinion of the CourtChadwick, J.

— Plaintiff brought this action to recover a balance alleged to be due upon a shipment of strawberries. Plaintiff alleged a sale at a stipulated price. This is denied by the defendant. It sets up affirmatively that the berries were consigned to it as a produce broker, to be sold for the account of plaintiff; that it sold the berries on the market and has accounted for the proceeds thereof. From a verdict *552in favor of the plaintiff for the full amount alleged to be due, defendant has appealed.

It is first contended that the court erred in denying appellant’s challenge to the evidence, and in…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Peterson v. Seattle Traction Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1900
  2. Williams v. NinemireWashington Supreme Court · 1900
  3. Carter v. Eighth Ward BankNew York Supreme Court · 1900
  4. Trumbull v. JackmanWashington Supreme Court · 1894

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. State v. GainesWashington Supreme Court · 1927
  2. State v. HazzardWashington Supreme Court · 1913
  3. Smith Sand & Gravel Co. v. CorbinWashington Supreme Court · 1913
  4. Martini E Ricci Lamino S.P.A.-Consortile Societa Agricola v. Trinity Fruit Sales Co.District Court, E.D. California · 2014
  5. Craig Ex Rel. Craig v. Village of MeridianIdaho Supreme Court · 1935

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API