Advance Bank v. United States
United States Court of Federal Claims
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion and Order
SYPOLT1, Judge.
Before the court are so-called “short form” cross-motions for partial summary judgment on the issue of liability for plaintiffs breach of contract claim.2 As directed at the status conference held on May 31, 2001, the parties also filed supplemental memoranda on liability in light of the decision in California Federal Bank, F.S.B., v. United States, 245 F.3d 1342 (Fed.Cir.2001), petition for reh’g and for reh’g en banc denied, 2001 U.S.App. LEXIS 17337 (Fed.Cir. July 10, 2001) (Nos.99-5108, 99-5119), cert. denied, — U.S. —, 122 S.Ct. 920, 151 L.Ed.2d 884 (2002)…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- United States v. Winstar Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1996
- Sri International v. Matsushita Electric Corporation of America and Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1985
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Franklin Federal Savings Bank v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2002
- First Federal Lincoln Bank v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2002
- American Federal Bank, FSB v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2003
- First Commerce Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2002
- Son Broadcasting, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2002
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.